# FILE NAME: 00000535.soc
# TITLE: Should we ban all smoking in public places? [8fa95f12f2a16242f97638f5e4dc1bd5]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 4
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - Smoking should be banned in all public places. It is harmful to both smokers and those around them. We should do all that we can to discourage smoking and help people to quit.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - Smoking should be banned in all public places. We should do all that we can to discourage smoking. This includes support for smokers to quit.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - Smoking should be banned in all public places. Second-hand smoke is harmful and unpleasant for non-smokers. Smokers need to be considerate to others and to their own health. We should do all that we can to discourage smoking. Smokers who wish to quit should be offered free nicotine patches or support to switch to e-cigarettes.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - Smoking is harmful to smokers and non-smokers. It causes cancer, heart disease and other illnesses and is unpleasant to be around. Smoking is expensive for society and we should do everything we can to discourage it. We should ban smoking in all public places and also provide more support for people who want to quit, such as nicotine patches or vapes. The procedure followed by these participants is a rough outline of the Dialectical Discussions and
2: 1,2,3,4
1: 3,1,2,4
1: 3,2,1,4
1: 1,3,2,4